Alright, everyone knows that any attempt at coming close to an objective analysis of anything political will always fail miserably, and this test does tend to trigger your bias alarm no matter what you believe, but it is still the best:
Where do you stand? Are you Hitler or Stalin? Do you want to fight the good fight against corporate excess or make your fortunes off of the unthinking and malleable masses? Here is mine:
Alright, everyone knows that any attempt at coming close to an objective analysis of anything political will always fail miserably, and this test does tend to trigger your bias alarm no matter what you believe, but it is still the best:
Where do you stand? Are you Hitler or Stalin? Do you want to fight the good fight against corporate excess or make your fortunes off of the unthinking and malleable masses? Here is mine:
Loading...
Tight! Between us we got a nice group going…. the best one here anyway. Fucking radicals…..
It scares me how many liberals there are on here.
Not just Liberals. Radical Liberals.
Ugh basically an eternal fence sitter 🙁
It’s been a while since I’ve done this…
Abortions for some, miniature American flags for others!
Yeah,,,,we do notice how everything scares you.
It looks like you are definitely right wing!
I would like to buy you a beer.
Which SG username is the Dalai Lama posting under?
always the same, never changes!
surprisingly accurate
And I’m viewed by some here as an extremist? fuck
An extreme troll,,,,,I thought we got that all sorted out.
So far im the only right leaning Libertarian. I guess i just cant give up my guns!
I’m right there whit Gandhi! Except I have more guns.
You always try to convince others that you have everything figured out. It’s your vain attempt at inflating your own ego. That’s your biggest flaw. Hubris.
What’d I win?
Next to ghandi….I guess I need a sammich?
Could you make it bigger you twat?
I knew I was going to line up as a fairly centrist libertarian. I’m pretty middle-of-the-road on most issues but I firmly believe that people should have the opportunity and rights to make decisions for themselves, for better or worse. Any society that restricts the options of its people I consider inhumane and stuck in the dark ages.
Consider the type of content we expose ourselves to every day on this site (minus the political posts). I’m not at all surprised by these results. And Ill save the trouble of posting my results as I’m sure you can just guess what they were.
no. I tried.
Don’t know if I agree, but….
you & I have nearly identical views, apparently
WHERE IS YOUR GOD NOW YOU FILTHY LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISTS SCUM?????
1%ERS UNITE!!!
A crate of M-16s.
Me, Ghandi an the fucking Dalai Lama. I am one with that.
Damn, I thought I was the most evil one here. I tip my hat to you sir.
Tax cuts for the rich. Seriously? and Corporations?
you mean take the only two groups in this country who are actually hauling it in and give ’em treats?
what is this, 1908? That shit is tired…
It’s been tried. It’s gotten pretty shitty since Reaganomics took hold. Roll that horse into a hole and leave it alone.
Bet you can’t guess which side of the Y axis I fall on ..)
Sweet. If you ever run for office, you’ll have my vote.
try harder, the graph didn’t fill my entire screen!
kindly: WHICH PART OF “EVIL” DONT YOU UNDERSTAND?????
“Multinational companies are unethically exploiting the plant genetic resources of developing countries.”
Muffukkin Double Rainbow, bitch, What does that shit MEAN?..
Good thing this wasn’t timed, cuz I had a good long stare at that one.
I had this same problem with the SATs, too, I kept actually thinking about it instead of just saying what I knew they wanted.
well would you look at that?
Fucking communist bastard. Don’t even think about laying a finger on my constitutional rights or income. I will evoke my 2nd amendment!
No surprise
I’m not saying I’m trying to offer tax cuts as a solution to any particular problems, I simply think that private entities should be able to contribute to the economy and the country rather than the government deciding what to do with it.
hahahahahaha
I think they will probably try to run with the most sane of the candidates. I don’t know who that is yet, though. Not too sure about the vice presidential nominee though. Might be a crazy lady.
sup
big surprise here. lol
Romney seems to be the one most likely to follow the game plan, willing to do what is politically expedient, easily bought. The only difference I can see between him and Obama is which side of the political landscape they appease every now and then. Wish there weren’t only two choices.
i’d settle for a crate of mosin nagant 1890/31
In fact I have, as I believe most Americans do, a firm belief that I’ll be wildly successful. Setting aside the value I choose to put on monetary rewards, let’s say that’s what I want. I believe I’ll get it. But that doesn’t change my feelings of the responsibility I have as a citizen of this country.
You call it “retributive justice” but it’s absolutely not. This isn’t about being a robin-hood to punish anyone, I think success is a GOOD thing.
But to say that there’s no responsibility that comes with achieving great success is very naive, or just greedy. One of my favorite people right now put it well here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOyDR2b71ag
We just don’t get successful on our own. Without government, we’d be spending all our time hunting and trying to make, from scratch, everything we need.
No, the mechanisms through which we climb to success are not our proverbial bootstraps. Yeah, it takes that, too, but without roads, schools, Police and Disaster response we’d spend all our time just surviving, and we’d never have the chance to be successful.
You know why America has driven innovation across the world for the last few centuries? Because it has done the best to give EVERYONE a chance to BECOME successful.
That’s what a tiered tax system IS. You profited the most from the advantages you were given and the resources you used, you give the most back.
Now, I’m not going to stand behind the way our government is acting these days, not at all.
In fact, long before I’d look to change anything in the tax code, I’d look to renew the separation between the church, of the mighty dollar, and state. To say that government is the problem is to forget what our founding fathers designed government to be, and what, at it’s core, it still is: a mechanism through which the will of the people (us) is enforced.
Again, let me remind you, that’s not how I think it’s acting today, but that’s because it has stronger interests, now, than the American people. It’s beholden to the interests of those who pay it most, and that, as it happens, is the top 1% of earners in this country. So your gramma’s got lung cancer from breathing in the fumes off a coal plant for the last 50 years, too bad, the company that’s killing her paid a lot of money to John Boner and now he wants to do away with the EPA because it’s too expensive.
I remember hearing in the run-up to the 2008 election that the majority of people DO believe they’re going to be rich. That most likely conservative voters that year cited that as the reason they opposed
Oh… I guess I went over the word limit. That’s a pretty good sign that I ought to finish short and sweet.
as I was saying…
I remember hearing in the run-up to the 2008 election that the majority
of people DO believe they’re going to be rich. That most likely
conservative voters that year cited that as the reason they opposed the
bush tax cuts.
You’re
right about the out-of-control spending, but you fail to notice that
most of it’s being spent on businesses, whether through bloated
contracts, subsidies, tax-credits or other bail-outs. You cut the
taxes on the people who have corrupted the system, you’re just
encouraging them to keep making it worse.
anyway, thanks for reading my book.
I tried to skip that one and then when it wouldn’t let me continue without answering, I emphatically stated to the screen “but I don’t fucking know what that means!”
True, he did do a lot of good things.
^^^ WILL be a crazy lady. Sad but Troo.
Bushmasters I hope!
You are assuming that I am for or against a number of positions simply because I am slightly to the right of things. I am a dual citizen of two countries, the United States and Australia. I am currently residing in Australia and it is a highly socialist country. My first son was born and the total cost for my wife and I to have multiple doctor visits and the delivery (which turned into an emergency caesarian) costs us $0. We are eligible for and receive money weekly simply for the fact that we are below a particular income line and we have a child. I didn’t apply for it for the longest time because I was in denial that it even existed, then felt like we didn’t need it when I was convinced it was real. Knowing that it was available, though, and we were eligible, weighed in on my decision making and eventually we actually did need it because I made bad financial decisions.
Not sure what assumptions you assume I’m making, I was trying to address the points you made.
At least American food is better. The world might consider Australians as some kind of BBQ champions but the truth is that their BBQ sauce is just ketchup mixed with worcestershire sauce. I’m not making that up.
I was down there a decade or so ago and yeah, I’m with ya there. Loved everything but the food (although the crocodile, emu, and wallaby platter was a treat!)
This is what I thought I was going to get! Hahaha