(4 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5)
Loading...
Author SozePosted on I preferred the previous site format
January 10, 2016 4:44 pm GMT -5
(4 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5)Loading...Author SozePosted on (4 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5)Loading...9 thoughts on “I preferred the previous site format”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
This is much more stable to me.
Sorry. Last site was costing me a huge amount of stress. Drupal sucks generally IMHO and host could not let us update to current due to database version they offer. This is much less stressful for me to manage.
IMHO, loads faster, loads everything as opposed to most things, etc. so good move all round. somebodies always going to be unhappy, so major points for giving a reasoned, applicable response instead of the usual internet middle finger. You’re such a nice guy, really.
understood, you’re right … maybe it’s a matter of adaptation, thanks for all attention on managing the site
🙂
You are welcome! Thanks for being a part of it!
I’m grateful Jerry is taking care of the website really 🙂
I preferred your other posts.
Simon says DO NOT FEAR CHANGE!